Jacqueliene Fernandez’s legal professional Prashant Patil opens up about Nora Fatehi’s latest declaration that she is being made a scapegoat in relation to the defamation go well with in connection with ₹200 crore extortion in which ‘conman’ Sukesh Chandrashekhar is the most important accused.
Actor Nora Fatehi lately recorded her declaration in a defamation case that she had filed towards fellow actor Jacqueliene Fernandez and media organisations, the place Fatehi accused Fernandez of tarnishing her popularity in the public eye by using spreading false narratives. Now, the latter is planning to are seeking criminal treatment to shield her privacy.
On Monday, Fatehi recorded her announcement earlier than a Delhi court, saying, “They referred to as me a gold digger and accused me of having a relationship with a con artist Sukesh Chandrasekhar. I experience I have been used as a scapegoat in this case in the media to guard sure human beings and due to the fact I am an outsider and I have been taken as a tender goal and I choose compensation for all the damages precipitated to my career. Jacqueline has requested the media why ED has taken me as a witness in the case and her as an accused. This assertion has led to extended needless harassment, loss of work and cyber bullying.”
In fact, Fernandez’s lawyer, Prashant Patil calls out Fatehi for dragging his patron into the felony mess, announcing she has in no way made any declaration towards Fatehi in public. At the moment, the actor’s prison crew is ready for an professional communication.
“We’ve no longer acquired any legit verbal exchange from courts, so we can’t verify any such developments. It’s a depend of admitted reality that Jacqueliene has by no means ever made any declaration towards all and sundry earlier than any electronic, print or social media. She has constantly maintained a dignified and sleek silence about the case, as the count number is subjudice and pending earlier than courts for adjudication,” he says, adding, “However, that doesn’t imply that she can be dragged into positive unwarranted criminal court cases for no fault of hers.”
Patil stresses that such arguments can’t be mentioned earlier than the public domain. “That itself is an act of civil and crook contempt of the respective criminal proceedings. If Jacqueliene is compelled into an unwarranted litigation or dragged into a pretend litigation towards her will, she’ll strategy the High Court for her rightful felony treatment for defending and safeguarding her critical proper as assured with the aid of the Constitution of India,” he argues.
Furthermore, he factors that they may take a “separate felony motion for contempt of courts” if the archives of courtroom are leaked and “used to provoke felony court cases whereby sure humans are now not even celebration to that proceedings”.
What has came about in the remaining one year
Last year, Fatehi filed a defamation case towards fellow actor Fernandez in a Delhi court. According to a supply shut to Fernandez, the actor, via her felony counsel, requested Fatehi to “sit throughout tables and talk about the misunderstanding”.
The insider informs us, “In her response, Jacqueliene shared that she has recognize for Nora, and cautioned having a dialogue to clear out the misunderstanding with a dialogue throughout the table, so that each the events can have a closure. But she didn’t hear again on the request until date. Now, we don’t be aware of if that request went until Nora or not. This used to be nearly six months ago. It would have been a extra mature and sleek way rather of going to the courtroom. Because Jacqueliene has in no way made a declaration towards Nora.” Reacting to Fatehi’s declare that she used to be focused for being an outsider, the supply mentions, “It’s unlucky to convey up this trouble of an insider or outsider. This united states loves all and sundry and is beneficiant to everybody. However, Jacqueliene is prepared to battle it out.”
What Nora Fatehi’s lawyer, Vikram Singh Chauhan has to say
“If she has now not completed whatever wrong, they have to file an affidavit in the court, what are they ready for. And when it comes to having a dialogue throughout the table, there has now not been any such request from their side,” Chauhan tells us.
